| The Last Supper The artist has presented some quotations from Volume 14, "Mysterium Coniunctionis" from the collected writings of the Swiss psychologist C. G. Jung. These quotations were instrumental in the development of the artist's painting of "The Last Supper". Contrary to Platonic philosophy and its development in Christianity, the artist believes the body of man to be an extension of the soul. The following quotations form the compliment to "The Last Supper". "Mysterium Coniunctionis" P. 124: "…even today most of us have not got round to understanding Christ as the psychic reality of an archetype, regardless of the historicity. I do not doubt the historical reality of Jesus of Nazareth, but the figure of the Son of Man and of Christ the Redeemer has archetypal antecedents." P 347: "The ultimate fate of every dogma is that it gradually becomes soulless. Life wants to create new forms, and therefore, when a dogma loses its vitality, it must perforce activate the archetype that has always helped man to express the mystery of the soul. …Only experience can establish which archetype has become operative, but one can never predict that it must enter into manifestation. Who for instance could logically have foretold that the Jewish prophet Jesus would give the decisive answer to the spiritual situation in the age of Hellenistic syncretism, or that the slumbering image of the Anthropos (true man) would waken to world dominion?" P551: "It (the realm responsible for inspirations and such happenings) presents a world of relatively autonomous "images", including the manifold God-images, which whenever they appear are called "God" by naive people, and because of their numinosity (the equivalent of autonomy!), are taken to be such. The various religious denominations support this traditional viewpoint, and their respective theologians believe themselves, inspired by God’s word, to be in a position to make valid statements about him. Such statements always claim to be final and indisputable. ...Thus Christianity, the religion of brotherly love, offers a lamentable spectacle of one great and many small schisms, each faction helplessly caught in the toils of its own unique rightness. … The existence of a transcendental reality is indeed evident in itself, but is uncommonly difficult for our consciousness to construct intellectual models which would give a graphic description of the reality we have perceived. … That the world inside and outside ourselves rest on a transcendental background is as certain as our own existence, but it is equally certain that the direct perception of the archetypal world inside us is just as doubtfully correct as that of the physical world outside us." |










